Tag Archives: Idaho4

Do you question the narrative?

With no Idaho 4 trial starting Oct. 2 (trial was postponed to a date and time to be announced), it is a good opportunity to look back at the tragic Nov. 13, 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students.

So, how comfortable are you with the narrative from the Moscow Police Department and others in a position of power?

While I bought into the stalker theory early on, I moved away from it months ago.

Why would someone like myself who has three-plus decades of reporter experience and has followed countless high-profile crime cases question the police narrative?

Guys like Ted Bundy, Danny Rolling and other notorious serial killers sadly made their mark by killing young women. Some of those women were killed in college settings. So, isn’t it possible that defendant Bryan Kohberger was trying to be just like them?

Sure, while Kohberger could have been infatuated with one or more of the three victims, such a scenario seems less plausible if you put emotions aside and think things over.

Any of the victims could have been easily kidnapped at a time and choosing of Kohberger’s.

The idea that the Washington State University teaching assistant would just waltz into 1122 King Road in the middle of the night because he was infatuated with Kaylee, Maddie or Xana seems a stretch at this point. Why risk being caught, potentially getting the bleep beaten out of you etc. when kidnapping them while on the way to/from school, walking or jogging, at the store etc. would be so much easier?

Even with a gag order in place. I’ve also got trouble with no full autopsy report being released, no toxicology report on the four victims, no 9-1-1 call let out after nine months and so on. Putting such information out there for the public is not going jeopardize BK’s chance to have a fair trial.

While this may not be a police and/or University of Idaho coverup, something smells fishy here.

Even though Kohberger does not strike me as having the highest IQ in the world, I also do not think he’s a dummy.

So, what might officials be hiding?

Could it be that drugs were involved or even a pay-for-sex scandal involving police or university officials?

That is not to say that any of the women living in the home or those like victim Ethan Chapin visiting were bad people.

Let’s face it; some college students get mixed up in things that may have started out rather innocent. At times, they can get in over their heads. That by no means says what happened to them on Nov. 13 was in any means justified. It was NOT justified and the person/s responsible need to pay a major price.

All four victims should be with us today living some of the best years of their lives.

With that in mind, are you beginning to question the bag of goods we are being sold by MPD and U of I?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Should cameras be allowed in the courtroom?

Although the trial date of Oct. 2 for Idaho 4 defendant Bryan Kohberger is off, there will be a trial.

One of the big points of contention has been whether or not to allow cameras in the courtroom.

On the one hand, you have some saying cameras in the courtroom are not only a distraction, but they also can prejudice some as to their views on the defendant. It is inevitable when cameras are in the courtroom that they are going to often focus on the defendant and his counsel.

On the flip side of the coin, you can argue cameras are good for a number of reasons.

Among them:

  • Educational to the public – Having cameras in the courtroom can prove to be educational to the public. How many of us can really call ourselves experts when it comes to the judicial process? While I have some knowledge of how things work in the courtroom, I would not call myself an expert by any means. Even with 34 years in the field of journalism and having covered some courtroom events, I’d not label myself an expert in how it all works. As such, I think allowing the public to see how a trial works can be beneficial now and later down the road.
  • More likely to have transparency – While I would by no means label myself a conspiracy theorist, I do have my doubts at times how our government in general goes about doing things. That can also trickle down to the state and local governing bodies. I think to take away even a hint of doubt in if things are on the up-and-up, having cameras in the courtroom can lessen and even remove those who may say the trial is rigged to one degree or another.
  • Taxpayer dollars at work – Finally, who do you think pays the salaries of many of the people in the courtroom, the governing bodies involved etc. and makes it so they can go to work in the first place in that facility? Yes, we the taxpayers. I feel it is important that we get to see our tax dollars at work.

There are definitely arguments for and against cameras in the courtroom.

If it were up to me, EVERY trial deserving such coverage would be available to the public to view live, not via a media pool, sketch artists etc.

So, do you want cameras in the courtroom when Kohberger goes to trial or are you fine without them there?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Kohberger waives right to speedy trial, future date to be set

When the news came out on Wednesday that the trial of Bryan Kohberger would not start on Oct. 2 as planned, was anyone all that surprised?

It had been noted for many weeks that the trial was likely not going to kick off as planned to start October. Now, we wait for notice of when the trial will get going.

With that in mind, you may have a trial starting closer to the holidays. You might also have a trial that will not get off the ground until 2024 at the earliest.

So, who might the winners and losers be from such a delay?

While it is hard to call anyone a winner or loser in such a tragic case, here are a few:

Winners

Prosecution – For prosecutors, they get more time to prepare their case. Keep in mind the burden of proof falls squarely on their shoulders. As such, they want an airtight case when the trial gets off the ground. Anything short of that runs the risk of the defendant walking free. Given there are many holes to poke in this case, the state now has more time to plug any of those holes.

Defense – It could also be viewed as a win for Kohberger and his defense team. Although if I were in his shoes I’d have gone with a speedy trial, this gives them more time to look at the DNA, surviving roommate/s potential testimony, how authorities have gone about processing this case and more. While I do think Kohberger is involved here to some degree, I highly doubt the narrative that he acted alone. This looks more like multiple people and a possible drug hit or deal gone bad to me than a simple stalker case. I will continue to state that if BK was so infatuated with one of the three female victims, he could have easily kidnapped them at a time and place where they would have been most vulnerable. Being in a home with five others and a dog is not putting you at your most vulnerable.

Losers

Family of the victims – The biggest losers by far are the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. They must endure this case dragging on for potentially many more months. Since so few of us have lost children in such a horrific manner, it is hard to rap your head around what they must be going through on a daily basis.

University of Idaho – Let us be honest in noting murder is bad for business when you are a university or college. As a result, the University of Idaho gets to stay in the limelight for months to come. Safe to say that is the last thing school officials want. It also means the home at 1122 King Road that they now own could be up for many more months to come. I have said from early on that it should stay up until the trial finishes. Tearing it down before the trial starts could be something the state ultimately regrets if Kohberger walks.

As we move forward with the Idaho 4 case, know that this tragedy is not going away anytime soon.

With that in mind, were you surprised the trial date of Oct. 2 got pushed back and if yes why is that?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Would you convict Kohberger today if on the jury?

While we are still a ways out from the trial of alleged Idaho 4 murderer Bryan Kohberger, the anticipation is nonetheless building.

With that in mind, where do you stand when it comes to Kohberger and his innocence or guilt?

For some people, they pretty much convicted Kohberger within days of his arrest late last year in Pennsylvania. For others, they believe in innocent until proven guilty. As such, they take a more measured approach to his allegedly being the murderer.

So, do you think the evidence is strong enough as of today to convict Kohberger? If yes, what stands out most for you?

In the event you do not think there is enough concrete evidence to convict him, why do you think that way?

On the he’s guilty side, you can argue the touch DNA evidence found on the knife sheath in victim Maddie Mogen’s bedroom by her body is quite convincing.

One might also argue that Kohberger’s reported driving by the home multiple times is the sign of a stalker. His “alibi” that he was out driving the night/morning of the killings will certainly ramp up suspicions that he is involved.

Finally, his cell phone reportedly being turned off during the time frame given for the four victims being killed screams strange.

On the flip side of the coin, those thinking he is innocent will point to several things.

For one, even if his cell phone did ping near 1122 King Road, it does NOT place him inside the home at the time of the killings.

Second, there has been no credible evidence to support remarks that Kohberger stalked any of the victims on social media.

Also, where is video of HIM fleeing the scene following the killings? If it is out there and conclusively shows him and not simply a white vehicle, I’ve not seen it.

Lastly, if the killings were as gruesome as the Moscow Police Department and other authorities seem to indicate, where is the blood trail leading out of the home?

Folks will no doubt continue to argue back-and-forth of his guilt or innocence.

If you had to vote with your fellow 11 jurors today, would you find him guilty or innocent?

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The absurdities of the Idaho 4 case

Even though it has been some nine months since the slayings of four University of Idaho students in the early morning hours of Nov. 13, 2022, the theories, verbal online attacks and more continue.

More notable are some of the perceived absurdities of this case that has grabbed the attention of not only many people nationwide, but also a fair amount around the globe.

With that in mind, we take a few moments to point out some of the perceived absurdities of the case to date.

Among them:

  • Alleged murderer Bryan Kohberger was stalking one or more of the victims – If you take a few moments to put aside the negative feelings you might have towards the defendant, stop for a minute and think about the stalking allegation. Would someone who was supposedly stalking one or more young women take a chance on spending time with them, kidnapping them or even harming them with multiple people in a home? Yet, that is what the individual would have faced if he indeed was at 1122 King Road in the early morning hours of Nov. 13. We know of at least four people in the home and possibly six if you count the two surviving roommates both in fact being there. We believe according to the PCA that Dylan Mortensen was there. Not so much is known about Bethany Funke’s whereabouts early that morning. Now, would you take your chances grabbing or killing one of the young women inside the home with all those people and a dog there in the middle of the night? Odds are most would say no. They’d wait to get the victim when most vulnerable. Kidnapping her going to or from class, out on a jog, going to or from a store etc. makes much more sense.
  • The killer wore a mask due to COVID – This has to be one of the more absurd claims I have heard for months. Hello! Do y’all remember the videos taken last summer when Moscow Police Department sent officers to the home related to noise complaints from neighbors? The videos are quite accessible on You Tube. With that in mind, watch one or both videos and tell me how many of the students wore masks due to COVID. If too busy to watch the videos, let me inform you that ZERO students on the videos wore masks. So, the killer is going to wear a mask at 4 ish in the morning while moving about because they’re scared of COVID? C’mon people…. use commonsense.
  • Drugs are totally out of the question – While many of the Kohberger haters live and breathe the stalker theory, other people think differently. One common thought is that drugs played a role in the tragic deaths of the Idaho 4. That by no means says that 1122 King Road was a big drug distribution center or was taking in a lot of drugs for the tenants there. What it does say is that drug usage or selling them is a possibility. Many people will tell you the residence was known as the party house to various neighbors and others on campus. Hey, many of us had our fun times in college and did not do drugs. That may in fact be the case here. Having said that, one would be naive to think that drugs are not at least a possibility here. Newsflash! Some college students buy and sell drugs. When you have family members with rap sheets due to drugs, one must explore the possibility that drugs were in play. If so, it by no means is an excuse to kill four young adults with their worlds ahead of them.
  • All Facebook discussion groups are legit – If you do a search of Facebook groups devoting their pages to the Idaho 4 murders, you will find a number of them. While most talk exclusively about the case at hand, some go off script more than occasionally. One in particular, University of Idaho Murders – Case Discussion, has turned into the local bullying and comedy store for all intents and purposes. The group admin AKA Alina Smith appears to turn a blind eye to anyone saying or demonstrating a lot of hatred towards Mr. Kohberger. Given surviving roommates Mortensen and Funke are key figures in this case, you’d think it would be okay to discuss them. Try doing that with any regularity on the site and you will be shown the door more times than not. Meantime, posting what are supposedly funny memes of BK, wishing him death etc. are perfectly fine. Hell, you can be a Realtor posing as a “legal expert” and talk about urinary issues. While there are some quality people in that particular group you can in fact have a healthy and adult debate with, they are few and far between. And if they have 222k members as they claim to, I have oceanfront property in Nebraska to sell you. Many are more than likely bots and countless duplicate accounts, many of which belong to the head honchos.

As we inch closer to a scheduled Oct. 2 trial date in Moscow, things will undoubtedly get a little more absurd in the process.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Would you have called 9-1-1 if you’re Dylan?

It is easy to play Monday morning quarterback following a sporting event.

Now, imagine yourself thrust into what turned out to be a quadruple murder case.

Hopefully, none of us will ever be put into such a position where we even have to contemplate what we’d do or in hindsight had done differently.

So, most people following the Idaho 4 case by now know that surviving roommates Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke have been under a bit of a microscope since last Nov. 13 and the deaths of Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin.

It was Mortensen and Funke who’ve walked away at least physically unharmed from the tragic events that unfolded at 1122 King Road. How they are doing emotionally may be another whole ballgame.

Once Mortensen was done with her PCA that the Moscow Police Department then put out there, it was determined that the Boise resident and University of Idaho student came within yards of the killer. Whether that killer was Bryan Kohberger or someone else will be determined at trial.

In the meantime, one can’t but help think about Mortensen’s actions or some might say inaction as the tragedy unfolded.

It was Mortensen in the PCA claiming to have opened her second floor bedroom door three times, the third one when she spotted an individual in dark clothing and wearing a mask covering their nose and mouth.

Since she likely knew it was not Ethan, and after hearing crying coming from Kernodle’s room just down the hall, most people would have been concerned. How many times do you see a masked individual passing by you in your home betweeen 4 ish and 4:25 a.m.? I am guessing the answer is not often if at all.

Sure, we have heard the theories that Mortensen may have thought it was a frat prank, it was cold outside, or even that COVID to some degree was still going on. Yes, all reasons we were told it would have been perfectly normal for a masked individual to be roaming around your home in the wee hours of the morning.

While I do not think Mortensen nor Funke had anything to do with the killings directly, it would have made sense given the circumstances to call 911 as soon as safe to do so. While we may never know, PERHAPS a life or two could have been saved.

The key to a stabbing, gunshot wound etc. is to stop the external bleeding, keep the individual awake and provide them as much comfort as possible until EMT’s arrive on scene. PERHAPS had a 911 call been made and police arrived on scene immediately we may not be talking four deceased victims.

On the flip side of the coin, all four victims may have died quite quickly from their wounds. That is something we will rely upon the medical experts to point out when they likely get called to testify.

I keep thinking about how the commotion, a masked individual, and crying coming from Kernodle’s room should have set off alarm bells for Mortensen. Supposedly she and Funke were texting back-and-forth during the time period in question. Whether that proves to be true or simply a myth is something else the trial can hopefully clarify.

The folks who keep giving cover to the two survivors for what in fact was inaction and not actions will tell you it was a party house, college students do strange things, Mortensen was just a girl etc.

Even college party houses require some commonsense at the end of the day.

As an added point, if you’re old enough to be away from home, pay rent, take college courses etc, you are NOT a young girl. You may be a young woman but you should be able to put 2+2 together and know something is amiss given the circumstances that were in play.

At the end of the day, would you call 9-1-1 with such circumstances or supposedly climb back in bed and drift off to sleep until 11:30 the next morning as we’ve been led to believe?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Could you sleep through a quadruple murder?

As we await the trial of quadruple murder suspect Bryan Kohberger in the Idaho 4 killings, many still wonder what the two surviving roommates were doing.

Let me be clear that I do NOT think either Dylan Mortensen or Bethany Funke were in on the tragic killings. If they did have any role in it, there is no evidence to indicate so.

With that to think about, I do question Mortensen’s replay of events during the estimated timeline that a killer or killers were in the house and took the lives of the four University of Idaho students.

As for Funke, we have not been definitively told where she was. Most assume she was asleep in her first floor bedroom and did not awake until much later the morning of Nov. 13, 2022. Others like myself wonder if she was at home during the killings to begin with.

If we assume Funke was home during the time of the murders, how might one sleep through such a thing?

Sure, earbuds or headphones listening to music, possibly being passed out if there was a night of drinking and other reasons could be in play. Still, it is hard to imagine four lives being taken, two on the floor above you and two on the floor above that, yet you would not hear a thing.

I get that off-campus homes can be party central and noises galore can fill the air. Even with that in mind, it is hard to fathom that one would not hear commotion on the floor above them at 4ish-4:25ish in the morning and not have questions.

Another possible theory is that Bethany in fact was not home during the killings and returned sometime later that morning.

Okay, this of course could be a possibility.

If this is true, would she go right to her bedroom on the ground floor or perhaps go upstairs to the second floor where the kitchen was? Assuming she came in through the front door on the ground floor if she had been out, she may not have noticed anything strange with the second floor kitchen patio slider door.

As for Dylan, her comments made in the PCA definitely lend themselves to questioning.

Among the things to wonder:

  • How does one open their bedroom door three times in a short period of time and not think there is a problem in the home? – One of those instances Dylan reportedly heard crying come from Xana’s room and also a male voice say (presumably to Xana) that he was there to help her. If true, why would Ethan say such a thing to Xana? Wouldn’t Dylan know Ethan’s voice by now? Thus, one would have to figure there was at least one other male in the home during this time period.
  • Is a masked individual in your home between 4 ish and 4:25 ish a.m. not cause for alarm? – Given Dylan reported seeing a masked individual walk by her bedroom door, is that not cause for concern? One would assume it is not Ethan for starters. You would also assume it is not a weather or COVID issue to be masked up inside the home.
  • Were Dylan and Bethany texting back-and-forth during the time period police estimate the killings took place? – Like many aspects of this case, rumors have been flying high. One of them is that the two survivors were in fact texting back-and-forth during this time. If so, hard to image they would then simply go back to sleep after things settled down. Rumors also stated that there were attempts made via texting to make contact with the other four in the home but to no avail.

When we do get to trial, I would be shocked if lead defense attorney Anne Taylor does not call both Dylan and Bethany to testify.

If she does in fact call them, would one or both try and plead the Fifth? In doing so, could they be setting themselves up for legal trouble?

While I usually give people the benefit of the doubt, something is amiss with the two survivors and especially Dylan’s story.

What that is could very well determine the fate of Bryan Kohberger being found guilty or innocent.

So, what’s your take on Dylan and Bethany and what they may or may not know.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Does the Moscow Police Department narrative work for you?

If you have been following the tragic Idaho 4 case now going on nine months, you know all too well the narrative put forth by the Moscow Police Department.

As MPD sees it, defendant Bryan Kohberger broke into the off-campus rental home in the wee hours of the morning of Nov. 13, 2022 and allegedly murdered the four victims. Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and boyfriend/guest Ethan Chapin were all brutally stabbed to death.

Roommates Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke survived the massacre.

Now, if you buy the MPD version of events, all one has to do is wait for Kohberger to be convicted at trial by a jury of 12 peers and he is done for. Sounds rather simple, right?

While everyone would like to think the police version of events is airtight and accurate down to the last detail, one also must not blindly follow the men and women in uniform.

It is important to remember that cops are people too. Sometimes they get things wrong. Sometimes a few bad apples taint what is an otherwise overwhelmingly good and honorable profession.

Coming from a family that had blue in it, I’ve always been a supporter of the men and women putting on the uniform. Most of them would take a bullet for you or me in a heartbeat. There are of course some exceptions as we tragically saw at the Parkland and Uvalde schools massacres, respectively. Inaction by those officers may well have cost some lives.

I think police in Moscow paint a compelling picture of what happened in those early morning hours of Nov. 13.

It could be reasonably argued that the defendant walked into the home and took out four individuals in a short amount of time, then exited the home and was a free man for some 6 or so weeks until his arrest in Pennsylvania.

On the flips side of the coin, one can argue that there are enough holes to be poked in the official narrative that at least one juror would have reasonable doubt.

Before I highlight a few of the challenges for the prosecution, let me remind you that the prosecutors may well have other evidence they’ll look to bring forward at trial. If that in fact occurs, it could spell curtains for Kohberger.

Meantime, some of the questions I have that I think the defense will look to exploit include:

  • Do you have a credible eyewitness at the scene or nearby the home able to place Kohberger entering or leaving during the timeline the murders supposedly occurred?
  • Do you have indisputable video that shows the defendant’s vehicle arriving at or leaving the scene during the timeline the murders were reported to have taken place? This would include catching a license plate on video.
  • Is their evidence from the defendant’s apartment, vehicle or place of work at Washington State University that directly ties him to the murders and/or the home at 1122 King Road in Moscow?
  • Was DNA recovered under the fingernails of any of the four victims that is a match to Kohberger’s? Are there any dog hairs from Kaylee’s dog Murphy that were found in BK’s home, car etc.?
  • Finally, how reliable is that touch DNA found on the knife sheath reportedly by the body of Mogen in her bedroom? You know darn well that the defense will bring in its own DNA experts to counter the prosection argument.

I am by no means saying the prosecution will end up with egg on its face. It may well have a case that is too hard for the defense to overcome in front of 12 jurors.

Having said all this, I think the defense will punch holes in a number of aspects mentioned above.

If I’m lead attorney Anne Taylor, I also call Mortensen and Funke to testify.

Trust me, it is NOT victim shaming to have questions about their respective stories from that night/morning at 1122 King Road. They were the ONLY people besides the killer/s in the home to survive. What they have to say should be of great interest to many people.

So, does the MPD narrative work for you or are you left with more questions than answers?

By all means share your thoughts with me!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Can Kohberger get a fair trial at this point?

I brought up a while back the question of can quadruple murder defendant Bryan Kohberger get a fair trial this fall or whenever the event will officially start?

Although the trial date of Monday, Oct. 2 has been set for the defendant in the Moscow, Idaho murders of four University of Idaho students, such a date could easily be pushed back.

With that in mind, it begs the question again of can the Pennsylvania native get a fair trial at this point in Moscow, Boise, or anywhere in the state for that matter?

While social media and the courts are two entirely different things, the former can have an influence on how people vote when it comes time to cast a verdict.

Yes, you are supposed to find 12 impartial jurors. Those jurors are not to come into a trial, especially one with so much notoriety, having had already determined in their minds guilt or innocence. It is only after both sides have presented their cases to the jury that jurors are to then proceed to go about making up their minds.

Sadly, social media has likely poisoned the minds of some potential jurors. The hope is such jurors will be weeded out and not be on the jury that will ultimately decide this man’s fate.

One only has to look at a group on Facebook like University of Idaho Murders – Case Discussion.

The site run by Alina Smith is not exactly a big fan of BK’s. The bulk of the posts on there are quite anti-Bryan Kohberger. In fact, some border on threatening BK’s existence as we know it. Unfortunately, it is at times like watching a cat or small dog trying to evade a pack of coyotes moving in for the attack. If you think Kohberger may be innocent or has the right to a fair trial, expect to defend yourself vigorously. Also stop for a moment and remember what the word DISCUSSION truly means.

Two examples of many would include: :

Look, I have suspicions he is involved in some capacity, be it either the lone perpetrator or one of several people who descended on the 1122 King Road home in the early hours of Nov. 13, 2022 and ultimately took four young lives. If Kohberger is in fact found guilty in a fair and square trial, by all means give him the stiffest penalty possible under Idaho law.

Meantime, it would be nice to have more groups like a few I joined of late that allow participants to discuss matters in a respectful way. These groups do not tolerate any shenanigans. Someone who feels Kohberger is guilty has every right to voice their opinion as do those who have questions about the case and want more evidence before potentially convicting a man on social media.

While I’d like to think Kohberger can get a fair trial come October or even later down the road, I doubt this more and more.

Do you think there are 12 impartial people in Idaho who will hear all the evidence and vote strictly off of that?

I hold out hope that is in fact the case.

Without such a thing, ALL of us lose at the end of the day in the America many feel offers the best court system in the world.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Could you produce an alibi in the middle of the night?

Much of the last week or so involving the Idaho 4 case has been centered around whether defendant Bryan Kohberger would be able to produce an airtight alibi. That is for his whereabouts during the early morning hours of Nov. 13, 2022.

Of course it was during that time period that four University of Idaho students were brutally murdered in their off-campus home at 1122 King Road.

As it turns out this week, Kohberger and his defense team did not give a clear-cut alibi as to where the defendant was during the time period in question.

Instead, Kohberger’s defense team put out a response in a two-page court document that their client has evidence to corroborate he in fact was at a location other than where the murders took place. Lead attorney Anne Taylor and her team concluded by noting that such details will at a later date (assuming they mean the trial) be provided pursuant to discovery and evidentiary rules along with the necessary statutory requirements.

So, this begs the question of could you produce an alibi in the middle of the night if asked to by a court of law, the police and so on?

Given authorities think the murders took place somewhere in the 4 a.m. to 4:30 a.m. time period of Nov. 13, many want to know where the former Washington State University teaching assistant was at that time and in the hours leading up to then and immediately after.

Face it; most people are either home in bed or at least home during that time period, coming or going to work, at work, or perhaps coming in from a very late night out.

Being able to produce an alibi, especially in the event you do not live with anyone, could be a tricky proposition. As such, some may suspect you in fact did do something that you should not have done.

While four students were murdered in the home on Nov. 13, two others survived.

Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke were lucky enough to live and tell their stories. Well, tell a portion of their stories or more apt story.

It was Mortensen in a PCA to authorities who said she was awoken no less than three times during the night to noise in the home. She ultimately reported that she saw a figure clad in dark clothing and wearing a mask walk right by her second floor bedroom door as she looked out one final time.

As for Funke, we’ve not been given much in the way of what she might have seen or heard. It stands to reason such details will come out at trial.

Online rumors have speculated that Funke may in fact have exculpatory information that could help Kohberger back up his reported innocence. Once again, such details if true will have to wait until the trial.

In the meantime, ask yourself if you would have no problem whatsoever producing a firm alibi during that time of the day if asked to do so.

Odds are many people would not find it quite as easy as they might think.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized