The time is ticking closer to what may be the trial of the century to date.
When the State of Idaho vs. Bryan Kohberger presumably gets going in early August, it will be close to three years since Maddie Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin were murdered in a rental home minutes from the main grounds of the University of Idaho. The quadruple slayings have not only gripped a good portion of the U.S. the last two and a half years, they have also garnered worldwide attention.
As another pre-trial hearing was winding down on May 15, one of the focal points the last two-and-half or so years has been the two young women who lived in the home at 1122 King Road along with three of the deceased roommates.
Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke were reportedly at home on two different floors when the killings took place.
First we were told the two had been asleep like everyone else supposedly in the home was when the killer/s struck. We later learned that the two had reportedly been texting and calling one another for a period of time prior to sunrise. If the latter is in fact true as phone records appear to indicate, wouldn’t they have some idea of what had tragically taken place on the second and third floors, respectively? Mortensen also told police she had seen a male figure in dark clothing and wearing a mask literally walk right by her as she carefully peered out her bedroom door on the second floor in the early morning hours.
While I have constantly said I do not believe either young woman was directly involved in the murders, I do feel one or both know more details than we have been told. If so, shouldn’t they be compelled to testify this August?
Even though the pair were interviewed by authorities (we know Mortensen was for sure, did they ever submit to a lie detector test if asked? If not, why was one never presented to them?
More interestingly, could it be one or both were not in the home at the time the four victims died? Phone records show the two conversing during what we believe was shortly after the killings took place, but were the two in fact in the home at the time? Could one or both have been nearby but not in fact inside the residence?
Finally, Mortensen claims to have seen a figure in the home with not only dark clothing and a mask, but bushy eyebrows. If the state will try and claim that figure was Kohberger, how reliable would Mortensen’s words be at trial? Reports are she was intoxicated at the time, so take what we’ve been told was her description of what she saw with a grain of salt.
While it is Kohberger and not the two young women on trial this August, Mortensen and Funke may well find themselves in the limelight once again.
So, should either side call the two to testify?







