Tag Archives: Dylan Mortensen

Does the Moscow Police Department narrative work for you?

If you have been following the tragic Idaho 4 case now going on nine months, you know all too well the narrative put forth by the Moscow Police Department.

As MPD sees it, defendant Bryan Kohberger broke into the off-campus rental home in the wee hours of the morning of Nov. 13, 2022 and allegedly murdered the four victims. Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and boyfriend/guest Ethan Chapin were all brutally stabbed to death.

Roommates Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke survived the massacre.

Now, if you buy the MPD version of events, all one has to do is wait for Kohberger to be convicted at trial by a jury of 12 peers and he is done for. Sounds rather simple, right?

While everyone would like to think the police version of events is airtight and accurate down to the last detail, one also must not blindly follow the men and women in uniform.

It is important to remember that cops are people too. Sometimes they get things wrong. Sometimes a few bad apples taint what is an otherwise overwhelmingly good and honorable profession.

Coming from a family that had blue in it, I’ve always been a supporter of the men and women putting on the uniform. Most of them would take a bullet for you or me in a heartbeat. There are of course some exceptions as we tragically saw at the Parkland and Uvalde schools massacres, respectively. Inaction by those officers may well have cost some lives.

I think police in Moscow paint a compelling picture of what happened in those early morning hours of Nov. 13.

It could be reasonably argued that the defendant walked into the home and took out four individuals in a short amount of time, then exited the home and was a free man for some 6 or so weeks until his arrest in Pennsylvania.

On the flips side of the coin, one can argue that there are enough holes to be poked in the official narrative that at least one juror would have reasonable doubt.

Before I highlight a few of the challenges for the prosecution, let me remind you that the prosecutors may well have other evidence they’ll look to bring forward at trial. If that in fact occurs, it could spell curtains for Kohberger.

Meantime, some of the questions I have that I think the defense will look to exploit include:

  • Do you have a credible eyewitness at the scene or nearby the home able to place Kohberger entering or leaving during the timeline the murders supposedly occurred?
  • Do you have indisputable video that shows the defendant’s vehicle arriving at or leaving the scene during the timeline the murders were reported to have taken place? This would include catching a license plate on video.
  • Is their evidence from the defendant’s apartment, vehicle or place of work at Washington State University that directly ties him to the murders and/or the home at 1122 King Road in Moscow?
  • Was DNA recovered under the fingernails of any of the four victims that is a match to Kohberger’s? Are there any dog hairs from Kaylee’s dog Murphy that were found in BK’s home, car etc.?
  • Finally, how reliable is that touch DNA found on the knife sheath reportedly by the body of Mogen in her bedroom? You know darn well that the defense will bring in its own DNA experts to counter the prosection argument.

I am by no means saying the prosecution will end up with egg on its face. It may well have a case that is too hard for the defense to overcome in front of 12 jurors.

Having said all this, I think the defense will punch holes in a number of aspects mentioned above.

If I’m lead attorney Anne Taylor, I also call Mortensen and Funke to testify.

Trust me, it is NOT victim shaming to have questions about their respective stories from that night/morning at 1122 King Road. They were the ONLY people besides the killer/s in the home to survive. What they have to say should be of great interest to many people.

So, does the MPD narrative work for you or are you left with more questions than answers?

By all means share your thoughts with me!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Are Dylan and Bethany being treated unfairly?

As we just recently passed the eight month anniversary of the killings of four University of Idaho students at 1122 King Road on Nov. 13, 2022, the story still remains fresh in the minds of many.

One of the central focal points of this tragedy continues to be the two young women who were not killed in the early morning hours of Nov. 13. That would be Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke.

As I said in another of my recent posts, I’m happy that the two were not also killed on that tragic morning. We could have been talking about six deaths instead of four had things played out differently.

With that in mind, here we are only a few months away from the tragic one year anniversary and with any hope at all a trial before that.

It stands to reason that one or both ladies will be called to be testify when we get to trial point in this case.

Keep in mind it was Mortensen in the PCA who said she saw an individual clad in black and wearing a mask with bushy eyebrows walk right by her second floor bedroom. So stunned by the sight, Mortensen said she went into a frozen state of shock. Heck, most people would be startled to some degree to see such a thing in a home they figured they’re safe in.

Meantime, it was assumed that Funke slept through all the horror one and two floors above her. While that may well be the case, one might also question the story given all the terror that went down in such a short span of time on the second and third floors of 1122 King Road.

So, being the only two tenants of the house to emerge alive, one may question if Mortensen and Funke have been untreated unfairly by some in the media, some in town and so on.

I think it is important to find a healthy balance here. No one should have to be in a home where one and let alone four of their friends are murdered in cold blood and be expected to emerge unscathed. On the flip side of the coin, it is only natural that authorities and the public in general would have questions of the two survivors.

There have been photos of late on social media of Funke in particular out and about in California. Among them was at a San Francisco Giants game and with friends in San Diego. Yes, a long distance from Moscow, Idaho where she was a student less than a year ago.

Now, I have zero issue with both Funke and Mortensen going about living their lives. As long as they truthfully testify at trial if called upon to do so, we can’t expect much more out of them.

Having said this, is it fair for people to snap pictures of them out in public months later? What I am asking simply is are they both hands off or do people have a right to be curious?

Unless it is proven down the road that one or both had a hand in the killings of their friends, both women should be allowed to go about living their lives.

With that in mind, do you think the ladies are fair game for pictures and respectful public comment when seen out and about? If not, why do you think the two key figures who’ve lived through a quadruple murder should be hands off?

Share your thoughts here and thank you as always for reading.

Photo credit: The Independent

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

What might Dylan and Bethany know?

If you know the Idaho 4, you’ve have heard of Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke.

The two were the surviving roommates from the house of horrors on Nov. 13, 2022 known as 1122 King Road.

I want to make it crystal clear before going any further that I am delighted both Mortensen and Funke survived the bloodshed. Imagine for a moment if they had not and we would be talking about an entire home full of tenants being wiped out.

Now, given both survived, questions continue to surface on what the two may know about that fateful early morning when Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and guest Ethan Chapin were slain on two different floors.

As stated in the probable cause affidavit, Mortensen claimed she saw a black clothed figure with a mask on and bushy eyebrows pass right by her second floor bedroom sometime around 4:15-4:25 a.m. From there, it is assumed the suspect then exited the home through the kitchen slider door. Mortensen reportedly went into a state of frozen shock and locked her bedroom door.

It was not until 11:58 that morning a 9-1-1 call was placed to local authorities. The call claimed there was an unresponsive tenant and help was sent. Of course we now know that Moscow Police located two bodies on the second floor and two on the top floor. All had been stabbed to death in one degree or another.

Again, thankfully both Mortensen and Funke survived.

So, what might one or both may know about the murders?

If you are in certain Facebook chat groups, you are not even remotely allowed to question the whereabouts, actions or even in-actions of both young women. Nope, it is hands off and don’t you dare send any negative or even questionable vibes their way.

Well, I have questions given this is a quadruple murder investigation and we are led to believe that both women were home at the time!

Among them:

  • How could you not hear screams and more? – Given Mortensen was in the bedroom below where Mogen and Goncalves died and the Boise native was only yards away from Kernodle’s second floor bedroom, how could she not hear anything unusual? Yes, any of us who were in college and lived in dorms or rentals know things get can a little wild, especially on a Saturday night. Even having thrown that fact into the mix, I find it hard to believe Mortensen did not hear more than the reported crying she stated hearing coming from Kernodle’s room. Sorry, but I am not buying what the MPD and prosecutors are selling.
  • Where was Funke during all of this? – Funke, who reportedly has since transferred out of the University of Idaho to another school, was said to be sleeping in her first floor bedroom, when this all went down. You could make an argument it would be harder for her to hear things, especially if she might have had earbuds in, been passed out etc. The fact that the defense team wanted to talk to Funke the other month raises my curiosity. What does the defense think Funke might be able to do for their client?
  • Would an immediate 9-1-1- call made a difference? – As everyone else it seems has done for eight months, I am speculating with the following. I think once we get to trial and have a relaxed gag order we will know a lot more. So, my speculation is that Kernodle did not die instantly like one, two or all three others may have. Given it is assumed Kernodle put up the biggest fight of the four victims, I speculate that the cries Mortensen said she heard coming from that bedroom was Xana in pain and calling out for help. A neighbor’s audio system reportedly picks up a thud from that side of the 1122 King Road home around 4:17 a.m. or so (we do not know the precise timeline in much of this case even now). My thought is the thud is Kernodle trying to get up and passing out from losing blood. I speculate she bled to death in her room. Much like one of the two deceased teachers in the Uvalde shooting last year, what if help had gotten there sooner? The difference between Uvalde and Moscow is that in the former, police and EMT’s were already on the scene but police stood around as more died before finally killing the shooter. In Moscow, once the coast was clear for Mortensen to go check on Kernodle after hearing crying, time could have made a difference. Stopping the bleeding and getting the victim stabilized before transport to a hospital would have been critical. Kernodle may well have passed in the home anyhow, but I will always wonder if she would have had a fighting chance with a much sooner 9-1-1 call.

Again, some will read this and call it victim shaming. No, these are legit things to think about.

What Mortensen and Funke know about that early morning needs to be gone over with a fine tooth comb when we get to trial. Not doing so would be a disservice to the four deceased among other things.

So, would you have questions for both survivors if given the chance to ask them?

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The most absurd things in the case to date

Sadly, we reached the eight-month milestone this week in the deaths of the Idaho 4.

When Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered back on Nov. 13, 2022, little did we know this case would take its share of turns, speculation and more.

Yes, many murder cases are not all that cut and dry. There always seem to be a few twists and turns as they proceed to trial and even once the trial gets underway until it finishes.

I will say as both a journalist and an observer in general of notable crime cases that this case has become more confusing as the months go by.

Yes, I thought it was pretty safe to assume we had a 28-year-old stalker on our hands when Bryan Kohberger was first arrested and even for a while after that.

Flash-forward many months later and I feel it is much more involved than this.

IMO, this case will ultimately prove to show drugs were in play in some manner and that is what led to the deaths of these four University of Idaho students.

As we await a scheduled trial Oct. 2, though the date could well get pushed back to later in the year or even 2024, here are the 3 most absurd things I’ve found to date:

  1. IT IS COMMON TO SEE MASKED PEOPLE IN YOUR HOME AROUND 4 A.M. – When one of the two surviving roommates had her info in the probable cause affidavit released, it was noted that she saw a masked figure pass by her. Dylan Mortensen also reportedly went into a state of frozen shock if you will and closed her second floor bedroom door. Now, while I am grateful Mortensen did not end up a murder victim, her story has bothered me from day one. While her version of events that early morning may ultimately pan out, they are strange to say the least. The mask thing is what intrigues me and how so many of Mortensen’s defenders think it is perfectly normal to see a masked individual in your home around 4 a.m. I have heard from her defenders that such an individual could be one of the U of I frat guys playing a prank, COVID was still around at the time and the person was simply protecting themselves and so on. First, I doubt such a prank is going to take place at that time of the day given the potential risk it involves. Suppose one of the residents has a gun in the home and in a moment of fright in seeing a masked figure they pull the trigger. Would you wear a mask in someone’s home at that time of day in mostly if not all dark conditions for any reason other than you were trying to conceal a portion of your face? Second, how many college kids do you know wearing COVID masks in a home around 4 in the morning? Please, if you know such people, send them my way so I can interview them. Obviously this individual was trying to shield their identity IMO. Mortensen should have had alarm bells going off in her head whether she was totally sober, a little drunk, on something and so on. Sorry, but I’m not buying what the mask is normal at 4 ish in the morning in a home crowd is selling.
  2. STALKING IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE MOTIVE IN PLAY – How many individuals do you know brazen enough to walk into a strange home in the middle of the night armed with only a knife? Keep in mind there were multiple vehicles in the parking lot at 1122 King Road when the killings took place. While I would only consider taking a life in self-defense, I sure as heck would not go into a home with only a knife, not knowing what is on the other side of the door. If a gun had been used in this tragedy I would be more willing to buy the stalking angle. The killer had no idea (unless tipped off by someone) who was there that night, how many guys may have been crashing there and so on. So, you mean to tell me the defendant just strolled in there because he had an obsession with one or more of the females in the home? If this were the case, why not kidnap them? You would have ample opportunities to do this. It could be on her way to or from class, while leaving or going to a business, out for a jog or walk and so on. Unless you are already a member of the Bryan Kohberger is guilty club, you’re leaving all options on the table, including a drug hit or a drug deal gone bad.
  3. KOHBERGER CAN GET A FAIR TRIAL IN MOSCOW – While I hope I am wrong on this one, it is becoming less obvious that the defendant can get a fair trial in the town of 25,000 or so. All one has to do is go on social media and look at some of the Facebook discussion groups for instance. Some of them are loaded up with people ready to see this guy pass away following a conviction. If this were the Old West, some would have already done away with BK. Look, I want to see justice for the Idaho 4 as much as anyone. Getting to that point means we have a fair trial and the defendant is afforded all his Constitutional rights. I know that social media and the courtroom are two entirely different things. Even with that in mind, it is appalling at some of the comments I’ve read over these last number of months. For some on social media, it is guilty until proven innocent. Here is breaking news for these people frothing at the mouth for a death penalty being carried out, the defense only needs to put a sliver of doubt in the minds of the jury for there to be a mistrial or even a not guilty verdict. It is up to the state of Idaho to 100 percent convince 12 men/women that Kohberger is the only killer and that he murdered these four students. While I know we are likely to see more evidence at trial, right now I could not convict BK on what I have seen and heard. Doesn’t mean he’s not guilty, I just would not be doing my job as a member of the jury if I convicted him right now.

So, what have you found to be questionable, strange and even absurd in this case to date?

Share your thoughts and let’s talk.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Will Dylan and Bethany be called to testify?

While we should always first and foremost remember the victims in the Idaho 4 tragedy, the two surviving females have garnered a lot of attention over the last six months.

For anyone following the case since news broke on the Nov. 13, 2022 tragedy, the names of survivors Dylan Mortensen (pictured above) and Bethany Funke have come up.

The two were not harmed in the early morning hours of Nov. 13 while three of their roommates and the boyfriend of one of the women were murdered.

If you are at all familiar with the 19-page PAC released a few months back, you know that Mortensen is mentioned as having reportedly seen the suspect on the home’s second floor. While not being able to give a precise description, the Boise resident said she saw a figure clad in black with a mask moving towards her second floor bedroom. The suspect then proceeded to exit the home via the kitchen slider door that leads to the patio. What happened to the suspect from there is not clearly known.

Fast-forward to Dec. 30 in Pennsylvania and arrested and charged with four counts of felony murder and a single count of burglary, alleged killer Bryan Kohberger, 28. Kohberger remains in jail, set to stand trial beginning Oct. 2.

When we get to the trial, it is certainly a possibility that both Mortensen and Funke will be called to testify.

So, will it be the prosecution or the defense calling one or both to testify? As it stands, both sides may want to have one or both women go on the record in front of a jury.

From the prosecution side of things, they hope Mortensen especially can nail down that in fact is was Kohberger she saw that night on the second floor of the home. It has been rumored that the defense may look to call Funke to the stand, claiming she may have some exculpatory information that could possibly clear their client.

You can also figure that the defense will look to have Mortensen get on the stand. They will likely claim that the young woman can’t definitively say under oath it was their client she saw in the home on Nov. 13 right after the murders.

As important as those things are, imagine the possible field day the defense could have with Mortensen for her reported actions (or to some her inactions) over the next 7-8 hours following the killings.

Among the things they may want Mortensen to explain would be:

  • Why did you or Funke wait so long to call 911? Is it possible one or both of you wanted to remove some potentially illegal items such as drugs for instance?
  • Were you under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time you claim to have seen an individual in the home ultimately making their way to the kitchen slider door? If you were under the influence, how can any of your statements be 100 percent credible?
  • Have you ever done drugs in your life, specifically at 1122 King Road?
  • If you heard crying and whimpering coming from Xana’s room as you indicated, why not go check on her once it was safe to do so?

If you are the prosecution, do you take a chance on calling Mortensen and/or Funke to the stand? It may well be they choose not to.

Meantime, you would have to think the defense team will be chomping at the bit to call both of them.

While you can argue one or both likely did not know their four friends has just been killed, the noises Mortensen reportedly heard should have at least warranted a welfare check on the four when safe to do so.

Buckle up…. I think this trial will be one for the ages when it eventually gets going.

Photo credit: DailyMail

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Do Dylan and Bethany Know More from Nov. 13?

If you have been following the Idaho 4 killings closely, the tragedy that took four University of Idaho students back on Sunday, Nov. 13, 2022, you no doubt have heard the names Dylan and Bethany (pictured first and third L-R in the photo).

Dylan and Bethany are the two young female survivors from that horrific scene that claimed the lives of Kaylee Goncalves, Maddie Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Goncalves and Mogen were found deceased in Mogen’s third floor bedroom, while Kernodle and Chapin were located in the former’s bedroom on the second floor.

The two survivors were home at the time of the event. Dylan reportedly in a second floor bedroom and Bethany on the ground floor.

It is estimated that the event happened somewhere between 4:05 a.m. and 4:20 a.m. Yes, in such a short span of time, four young lives were tragically ended.

So, how is it that Dylan and Bethany escaped with no injuries and lived to tell about it?

Those following the case closely know that a 911 call for the Moscow Police Department was not made until 11:58 a.m. Some 7-8 hours passed from when the tragedy began to when authorities were alerted of a supposed unconscious individual in the home at 1122 King Road (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_-fAgUSIh8).

We also know from the PCA that was given out a few months back by police that Dylan reportedly saw a figure clad in black and wearing a mask go right past her on the second floor, exiting the home through the kitchen slider door by the patio. Dylan, a Boise resident, was reportedly so frozen that she closed her bedroom door and did not emerge until late that morning.

Okay, how many times have you opened your bedroom around 4:20 ish a.m. and seen a tall, black clothing clad and wearing a mask individual walk by you? I am guessing the response is few to no times. Keep in mind Dylan reportedly opened her bedroom door three times during the 15 minutes or so that the killings were taking place. Dylan reportedly heard noises that included crying and whimpering coming from Kernodle’s room not far from her on the second floor.

Nowhere in the PCA does it mention that Bethany heard or saw anything from her first floor bedroom vantage point. In fact, most assume Bethany slept through it all.

Okay, as a journalist of 30+ years, I have many questions from this. Among them:

  • Why would Dylan not go and knock on Xana’s door after the suspect left the home? Dylan reportedly tried texting different roommates in the home to no avail. Keep in mind that crying and whimpering are two different things. If Dylan heard what she thought was Xana both crying and whimpering, why not go check on her once safe to do so?
  • Why not text and/or go downstairs once safe to do so and get your best friend Bethany up? The two then could have gone to check on Xana together. One would also think checking on the two women on the third floor would be a rationale line of thinking given there appeared to be a stranger in the home at such an odd hour.
  • Why the long delay from when the incident occurred to someone (supposedly Bethany) calling 911? While none of us are privy to the medical examiner’s report, perhaps one or or more of the deceased may have lived had they gotten immediate medical attention. Yes, chances may be slim, but we will not know until more comes out at trial. In fact, much like the tragic Uvalde school shooting in 2022, we may never know here if one or more lives could have been saved if EMT’s were on the scene sooner than later.
  • Finally, is there a chance Dylan and Bethany did not want authorities in the home right away? The home was a well-known party house. Could there have been things in the home that one or more residents would not have wanted police to discover. Trust me, police could care less about drinking and even drugs in a home when there have been four murders.

As we get to an October trial, hopefully we will learn more about what Dylan and Bethany know what really went down those early morning hours at 1122 King Road.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized